The 25 staffers who make Capitol Hill runįreedom Caucus digs in on spending demands of McCarthy New Mexico governor temporarily bans guns: What you need to know Virginia Democratic candidate denounces sharing of sex tapes: ‘It won’t. Senate GOP says House lacks evidence for impeachmentġ03 House Democrats join calls for Biden to open up the immigration playbookĪbbott hits Adams for migrant complaints: He ‘could not last a week in. Mark Meadows decision delivers a powerful lesson - and a blow to TrumpĬhina preparing for war with US, Air Force secretary says Senate GOP unhappy with McCarthy on impeachment inquiry: ‘It’s a fool’s. How Jack Smith can prove Trump knew he lost the 2020 election This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. ]The total cost of the inauguration, $107 million including private donations, was more than twice as much as former President Obama’s in 2009.Ĭopyright 2023 Nexstar Media Inc. The four-day inaugural celebration cost more than $27.3 million in public funds, and reportedly still had an outstanding balance of more than $7 million owed to the city of Washington, D.C., as of June. The White House did not immediately return a request for comment on the emails or the investigation. “They were hoping for a New York socialite who would not look at the details.” “Stephanie was underestimated,” one ally of Winston Wolkoff’s told CNN. “I am expressing my concerns because I have no options at this point,” she wrote in one email, reportedly citing “many line items that were not reflected, rentals that were not sourced, budgets that were not accurate and décor elements that were not feasible.” Otherwise I am regrettably unable to provide any substantive comment,” she said in a statement to CNN in April.Įmails obtained by CNN indicated that Winston Wolkoff clashed with former Trump inaugural committee chairman Tom Barrack over one vendor, Hargrove Inc., which she reportedly believed was charging exorbitant prices for services. “If the were to release me from this obligation, I would be able to speak freely without the fear of legal or financial repercussions. In a statement to CNN, Winston Wolkoff declined to comment, citing a nondisclosure agreement that she signed upon joining the 2017 inauguration planning team. Winston Wolkoff reportedly received a subpoena from Washington, D.C., Attorney General Karl Racine, who requested that she turn over all documents in her possession detailing expenditures that she deemed “wasteful, mismanaged, and/or improperly provided private benefit.” A former adviser to first lady Melania Trump was among those who raised concerns about supposedly excessive spending by members of the Trump inauguration committee, according to court documents reviewed by CNN.ĬNN reported Thursday that Stephanie Winston Wolkoff has become a witness in the ongoing investigations into whether the inaugural committee misspent funds or accepted bribes in exchange for access to top officials.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |